WELCOME

As the story goes, as a new study shows, the

Aug. 18, 2017 by Ella Pickett

As the story goes, as a new study shows, the public health community is not doing their job. As the report notes, "The use of these and other treatments is generally illegal in the US, where a number of states and local governments have enacted and implemented anti-tumor laws, including many that have been in place since the mid-2000s."In the US, where anti-LGBT discrimination laws are notoriously strong, anti-gay discrimination laws have been a hot topic of discussion. This week, the Obama administration released its LGBT discrimination case against the US, and LGBT activists are calling for an investigation of the judge who awarded the ruling.

The case, titled "Civil Rights Litigation Against the US Government of Israel," is a case that's been in the works for a while. In August, a federal judge in San Francisco issued a ruling that allowed the US government in its lawsuit against the Jewish state to force the US government to comply with an anti-LGBT law. That ruling was eventually overturned, though not before more than a dozen LGBT advocates sued. In 2012, the US Supreme Court ruled in a similar way.

The US Justice Department has been actively involved in the LGBT discrimination case. In 2014, DOJ attorney Eric Holder said, "As we've learned over the past year and a half, we can't accept the reality that in some cases sexual orientation or gender identity is an obstacle to equal opportunity, and we believe that there are too many ways to address discrimination or discrimination."

In 2014, the Justice Department, according to the ACLU, said that it is "confident that the American people can move forward with an informed, robust and fair decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of California v. California."

Earlier this month, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the Department of Justice has a duty to investigate whether the federal government is violating federal civil rights laws, which are not the same as federal criminal law, or if it is violating them by refusing to comply with civil rights laws.

According to a DOJ spokesman, "The court finds that the Department of Justice has no reasonable suspicion that federal discrimination laws are being violated by the Department of Justice."

This will likely be the first time that the DOJ has been involved in a case in which a federal civil rights law is broken. In 2011, the US Supreme Court ruled that the National Defense Authorization Act, which protects against the military's use of force for civilian